Salut tout le monde.
Je voudrais savoir quelles sont les principales différences entre BSD et Linux.
Qui peut m'éclairer ?
Version complète : Bsd
Citation
The key difference between BSD and Linux can be summarized in a single term: integration, meaning both a process and the result of this process.
Each BSD distribution is considered a single project. Linux distributions on the other hand are combined from a multitude of separate projects, many of which aren't even Linux-specific. There is a Linux kernel project led by Linus Torvalds. There are toolchain and C library projects. There are a host of different GNU projects that provide various tool collections. And so on.
On BSD, the developers are also the integrators. If somebody wanted to change the output of, say, ls -l, he would also feel responsible for taking care that any scripts in the system that depend on a particular format for the ls(1) output would also be adapted. In the Linux world, the system integrators who combine many different projects into a distribution are generally not developers of those projects. The resulting system integration of BSD is tighter. Man pages are more complete, programs interoperate better, there is a more consistent look and feel to the system.
Some often mentioned differences between BSD and Linux are merely the result of BSD's single project mindset: All of the base system is contained in a single CVS tree, i.e. all of it is under version control. From there, the complete source tree can be checked out and re-compiled in one go. This is generally known as make world, from the single command that can be used to rebuild the system. So far, no Linux distribution has been able to provide its source in a CVS tree, and in fact not even the Linux kernel is under proper version control, resulting in a rather cumbersome (from a BSD perspective) development process.
Another resulting difference is the clear demarcation between base system and additional software under BSD. Many Linux distributions now ship half a dozen CDs full of packages. There is little guidance which parts belong to the core system and which are optional, which have been rigorously tested and audited, and which were just added because the source was available on the net.
Each BSD distribution is considered a single project. Linux distributions on the other hand are combined from a multitude of separate projects, many of which aren't even Linux-specific. There is a Linux kernel project led by Linus Torvalds. There are toolchain and C library projects. There are a host of different GNU projects that provide various tool collections. And so on.
On BSD, the developers are also the integrators. If somebody wanted to change the output of, say, ls -l, he would also feel responsible for taking care that any scripts in the system that depend on a particular format for the ls(1) output would also be adapted. In the Linux world, the system integrators who combine many different projects into a distribution are generally not developers of those projects. The resulting system integration of BSD is tighter. Man pages are more complete, programs interoperate better, there is a more consistent look and feel to the system.
Some often mentioned differences between BSD and Linux are merely the result of BSD's single project mindset: All of the base system is contained in a single CVS tree, i.e. all of it is under version control. From there, the complete source tree can be checked out and re-compiled in one go. This is generally known as make world, from the single command that can be used to rebuild the system. So far, no Linux distribution has been able to provide its source in a CVS tree, and in fact not even the Linux kernel is under proper version control, resulting in a rather cumbersome (from a BSD perspective) development process.
Another resulting difference is the clear demarcation between base system and additional software under BSD. Many Linux distributions now ship half a dozen CDs full of packages. There is little guidance which parts belong to the core system and which are optional, which have been rigorously tested and audited, and which were just added because the source was available on the net.
http://sites.inka.de/mips/unix/bsdlinux.html
Merci beaucoup, voila une énumération claire et simple des avantages de BSD.
Une autre question que je me posais est celle-ci.
Il y a beaucoup de softs pour linux, mais certains d'entre eux ne sont pas disponibles pour BSD. Y en a-t-il beaucoup ? (je ne parle pas bien sur du fait qu'ils ne soient pas compilés pour BSD, mais du fait que les sources soient compatibles ou non)
Une autre question que je me posais est celle-ci.
Il y a beaucoup de softs pour linux, mais certains d'entre eux ne sont pas disponibles pour BSD. Y en a-t-il beaucoup ? (je ne parle pas bien sur du fait qu'ils ne soient pas compilés pour BSD, mais du fait que les sources soient compatibles ou non)
ba mekza va pouvoir t'aiguiller surement mieux avec des arguments cohérent puisqu'il utilise quotidiennement BSD !
Il est overbooké en ce moment mais il pourra sûrement t'aider ( il est dessous depuis environ un gros mois ) .
aaah, merveilleux ! eh bien j'attendrai qu'il poste ici une réponse 
Ceci est une version "bas débit" de notre forum. Pour voir la version complète avec plus d'informations, la mise en page et les images, veuillez cliquer ici.